Online Casino Opposition Heats Up in Congress

United States lawmakers have an often-confusing relationship with gambling, as well as with technology. While they often gain benefits from the taxes levied on gambling, there is a veneer of moral regulation that often leads those in Congress to argue against gambling in addition to passing laws to restrict it.

In fact another round of these arguments is going on right now. However, there’s more to this latest bill against online gambling than meets the eye.

What’s Going On?

On the surface the bills introduced by Senator Lindsay Graham and Representative Jason Chaffetz look like politics as usual. These bills are aimed at curbing the expansion of online gambling in the United States further than is already the case, restricting online casinos from boasting features like online poker, slot machines, or table games. For those who are regular patrons of online casinos these pieces of legislation would completely gut the games offered by most online casinos. While there are some games that would still be available, a lot of players would be very upset if these bills were signed into law.

Why Is This Happening?

The bills, both the one in the House of Representatives and the one in the Senate, are both aiming for a “protect the children” angle. The idea seems to be that online casinos are somehow a threat to children, even though they require a bank account and the ability to be of a legal age in order to play. The angle plays very well in the media, especially among moral crusaders who feel that online gambling is a shady operation that should be done away with completely, but there are dark shapes moving much deeper below the surface.

Who’s Backing These Bills?

Anyone who follows politics knows that nothing happens without someone using a lot of time and money to put an issue on top of the “fix this” board that legislators work from. While the usual suspects of the moral majority, the religious right, and advocates who want to make gambling in all its forms illegal make good targets, the actual person funding these bills might come as a surprise.

The funding is coming out of Las Vegas. Specifically speaking, the funding is coming in large part from Sheldon Adelson; the CEO of the Las Vegas Sands. Why is one of the biggest gambling establishments in a place called Sin City funding a bill to stop Internet gambling? Well, the short version is because if the bill goes through it would crush the Sands’ competition.

The Big Picture

The popularity of online gambling means that people don’t have to go to a physical casino to gamble anymore. Players can use any device with Internet access, and enjoy all of the gambling they want. This is a nail in the coffin of big outfits like those in Las Vegas and Atlantic City, who depend on people coming fro all over the country to play. If online gambling is cut off at the knees, people will have no other choice but to seek offline solutions.

Get $1,000 Welcome Bonus at WinPalace Casino!


  1. the existence of online gambling and online casino does facilitate the most people to play. without being limited space and time they can freely play with satisfied as long as their funds there.

    This is the danger bai age children not because access to the casino website is very easy to reach for all people.

    I wonder if the government participate in regulating laws on gambling and casinos

  2. Yes, like an edged knife 2 . Difficult for decisions must to do by laws to be filed opposition Congress. On one hand the government get benefited from the tax, on the other side there is concerns children under age may play an online gambling. And places casino is look lonely there because they will think it is easier to play via online whenever and wherever it can.

  3. Are they forget who paid their campaign in the election?

  4. No they don’t forget, they just dress up to look pretty infront of their elector, and then after that, to whom they ask the fund raising to pay their enormous campaign cost?

  5. whereas very large casino tax to the state itself, in addition to the income of the country is also increasing due to the casino.

  6. These political tactics never fail to amuse me. How can politicians stoop so low. They come running to you when they need their funds and they oppose you when they wish to improve their image in front of the public. Disgusting!

  7. yeah i agreed with bernardbear, sometimes they’re only pretend to be naive.

  8. Pretend to be naive? Yes i think so, they pretend to forgot their promises to the elector everytime they broke their promise..

  9. yah difficult position, on the one hand they need financial support and on the other they have to look good in front of the general public

  10. in determining the financial condition sometimes we do not naive, because it is a personal matter for someone. because, if he had been a leader of the most important is not because of where he comes from and its financial capital, but as where he led the way and the prosperity of its people. of course if it is successful, then from where he came from will not be seen by the people

  11. indeed in general, people who sit in congress have a naive nature, one side does not agree with online gambling, on the other accept if there is an advantage of the online casinos.

  12. The era of online gambling can not be avoided. The reason for protecting children, can be done in the presence of strict regulations age restrictions opening bank accounts and online gambling account.

  13. Of course, I am also agree with all of those members whose are saying that children access should be avoided. But, I think it is very very difficult to stop the children to do so for online casinos or games etc despite the presence of so many rules for this. I have seen so many under ages boys whose are using their Father’s or elder brother’s identity to access the online accounts. You can say that I have seen so many little scammers. They are using the name of their father, provide the identity details of their father and playing games and doing gambling easily.

  14. @hafiz786 ! you are correct. I agree with you. It is almost impossible to get the satisfactory level for rules and regulations. Abusers and scammers update their skills as well as laws and rules making authorities update their security. I think, there is always a security hole behind the strong , stronger, and strongest security door. Do you know?

Submit a Comment